[물리·과학·IT]

Gravitation by Misner

kipacti 2013. 10. 15. 00:16

SPACETIME PHYSICS 

Wherein the reader is led, once quickly (§/./), 

then again more slowly, down the highways and 

a few byways of Einstein's geometrodynamics— 

without benefit of a good mathematical compass. 



CHAPTER 

GEOMETRODYNAMICS IN BRIEF 

§1.1. THE PARABLE OF THE APPLE 

One day in the year 1666 Newton had gone to the country, 

and seeing the fall of an apple, as his niece told me, let himself 

be led into a deep meditation on the cause which thus 

draws every object along a line whose extension would pass 

almost through the center of the Earth. 

VOLTAIRE (1738) 

Once upon a time a student lay in a garden under an apple tree reflecting on the 

difference between Einstein's and Newton's views about gravity. He was startled 

by the fall of an apple nearby. As he looked at the apple, he noticed ants beginning 

to run along its surface (Figure 1.1). His curiosity aroused, he thought to investigate 

the principles of navigation followed by an ant. With his magnifying glass, he noted 

one track carefully, and, taking his knife, made a cut in the apple skin one mm 

above the track and another cut one mm below it. He peeled off the resulting little 

highway of skin and laid it out on the face of his book. The track ran as straight 

as a laser beam along this highway. No more economical path could the ant have 

found to cover the ten cm from start to end of that strip of skin. Any zigs and 

zags or even any smooth bend in the path on its way along the apple peel from 

starting point to end point would have increased its length. 

"What a beautiful geodesic," the student commented. 

His eye fell on two ants starting off from a common point P in slightly different 

directions. Their routes happened to carry them through the region of the dimple 

at the top of the apple, one on each side of it. Each ant conscientiously pursued 

his geodesic. Each went as straight on his strip of appleskin as he possibly could. 
Yet because of the curvature of the dimple itself, the two tracks not only crossed 
but emerged in very different directions. 
"What happier illustration of Einstein's geometric theory of gravity could one 
possibly ask?" murmured the student. "The ants move as if they were attracted 
by the apple stem. one might have believed in a Newtonian force at a distance. 
Yet from nowhere does an ant get his moving orders except from the local geometry 
along his track. This is surely Einstein's concept that all physics takes place by 
'local action.' What a difference from Newton's 'action at a distance' view of physics! 
Now I understand better what this book means." 
And so saying, he opened his book and read, "Don't try to describe motion 
relative to faraway objects. Physics is simple only when analyzed locally. And locally 
the world line that a satellite follows [in spacetime, around the Earth] is already 
as straight as any world line can be. Forget all this talk about 'deflection' and 'force 
of gravitation.' I'm inside a spaceship. Or I'm floating outside and near it. Do I 
feel any 'force of gravitation'? Not at all. Does the spaceship 'feel' such a force? 
No. Then why talk about it? Recognize that the spaceship and I traverse a region 
of spacetime free of all force. Acknowledge that the motion through that region 
is already ideally straight." 
The dinner bell was ringing, but still the student sat, musing to himself. "Let me 
see if I can summarize Einstein's geometric theory of gravity in three ideas: (1) 
locally, geodesies appear straight; (2) over more extended regions of space and time, 
geodesies originally receding from each other begin to approach at a rate governed 
by the curvature of spacetime, and this effect of geometry on matter is what we 
mean today by that old word 'gravitation'; (3) matter in turn warps geometry. The 
dimple arises in the apple because the stem is there. I think I see how to put the 
whole story even more briefly: Space acts on matter, telling it how to move. In turn, 
matter reacts back on space, telling it how to curve. In other words, matter here," 
he said, rising and picking up the apple by its stem, "curves space here. To produce 
a curvature in space here is to force a curvature in space there," he went on, as 
he watched a lingering ant busily following its geodesic a finger's breadth away from 
the apple's stem. "Thus matter here influences matter there. That is Einstein's 
explanation for 'gravitation.'" 
Then the dinner bell was quiet, and he was gone, with book, magnifying glass—and 
apple. 
Space tells matter how to 
move 
Matter tells space how to 
curve 
§1.2. SPACETIME WITH AND WITHOUT COORDINATES 
Now it came to me: . . . the independence of the 
gravitational acceleration from the nature of the falling 
substance, may be expressed as follows: In a 
gravitational field (of small spatial extension) things 
behave as they do in a space free of gravitation. . . . This 
happened in 1908. Why were another seven years required 
for the construction of the general theory of relativity? 
The main reason lies in the fact that it is not so easy to 
free oneself from the idea that coordinates must have an 
immediate metrical meaning. 
ALBERT EINSTEIN [in Schilpp (1949), pp 65-67] 
Nothing is more distressing on first contact with the idea of "curved spacetime" than 
the fear that every simple means of measurement has lost its power in this unfamiliar 
context. one thinks of oneself as confronted with the task of measuring the shape 
of a gigantic and fantastically sculptured iceberg as one stands with a meter stick 
in a tossing rowboat on the surface of a heaving ocean. Were it the rowboat itself 
whose shape were to be measured, the procedure would be simple enough. one 
would draw it up on shore, turn it upside down, and drive tacks in lightly at strategic 
points here and there on the surface. The measurement of distances from tack to